Must read papers for graduate students
This post is sparked by an ongoing conversation on twitter that was kicked off when Matthew Hahn and Matt Pennell got to talking about developing a list of papers that should be required reading for graduate students with an interest in phylogenetics. This a good question, and I can’t recall seeing one. I start teaching on phylogenetics in our graduate core course here at UH next week and the 2015 Bodega workshop is only a few weeks away, so I’m finding this to be a timely and useful conversation.
.@mwpennell Speaking of which, have you ever seen a list of papers that should be required reading for every phylogenetics student?
— Matthew Hahn (@3rdreviewer) February 12, 2015
@mwpennell Let's just start on twitter. I say Felsenstein 1973, 1978, 1981, and 1985.
— Matthew Hahn (@3rdreviewer) February 12, 2015
There are already several good suggestions from folks on twitter, including, well….most of Joe Felsenstein’s early phylogenetics papers and his book, Maddison’s 1997 paper and Edwards 2009 paper on gene tree conflicts, and Sullivan and Swofford’s 1997 paper on the importance of adequate models (of course, guinea pigs are also a noble beast deserving of study in their own right).
Please jump into the conversation on twitter with your suggestions, or leave them here in the comments. I’ll post an update with a bibliography in a few days. Thanks to Matt and Matt for bringing this up!
.@3rdreviewer @mwpennell Thinking Felsenstein '81 MLE paper and chp. 10 (on history) from his book as context, but interested in other ideas
— Bob Thomson (@rcthomson) February 12, 2015
.@mwpennell @rcthomson I'd have to go with Edwards 2009 for a recent paper that touches on some of the same topics.
— Matthew Hahn (@3rdreviewer) February 13, 2015